Home > Ticket 16 – IPv6 RIPng OSPFv3 Redistribution

Ticket 16 – IPv6 RIPng OSPFv3 Redistribution

March 16th, 2015 in TSHOOT v2 Go to comments

Problem: Loopback address on R1 (2026::111:1) is not able to ping the loopback address on DSW2 (2026::102:1).

Configuration of R4:
ipv6 router ospf 6
 log-adjacency-changes
!
ipv6 router rip RIP_ZONE
 redistribute ospf 6 metric 2 include-connected
!

Answer:
Ans1) R4
Ans2) Ipv6 OSPF Routing
Ans3) Under ipv6 ospf process add the ‘redistribute rip RIP_Zone include-connected’ command

Comments (31) Comments
Comment pages
1 2 3 4 698
  1. Francis
    May 26th, 2017

    Anyone wanting to take TSHOOT everything is here there is no dump to waists your money on
    If you study topology n tickets, n 6 mcg the test is not hard.
    When you take the exam n are in front of computer write this down
    In this order.
    3, ASW1
    1, DSW1
    4, R1
    0, R2 1
    0, R3 1
    2, R4 1
    ipv4 is on rt n ipv6 tickets on right
    That is troubleshooting that I used and I passed.

  2. Francis
    May 26th, 2017

    Dumps are not valid they are old format not new format just use networking that is all you need for 9.00

  3. Cisco
    May 29th, 2017

    @Francis

    You mind helping out a little more {email not allowed}? Please

  4. Cisco
    May 29th, 2017

    @ Francis
    8bitz4me @ gmail

  5. Hopeful
    June 7th, 2017

    IPv6 Ping Plan
    R1#ping ipv6 2026::1:2 (Can you reach the R3 Area 0 interface)
    No –> IPv6 OSPF
    Yes R1# ping ipv6 2026::34:2 (Can you reach the R4 GRE tunnel interface)
    No –> IPv6 GRE Tunnel
    Yes –> IPv6 RIPng OSPFv3

    You can also determine the answer using sh ipv6 ospf nei on DSW1.
    No routes for ospf area 12 (2026::12) –> R2: IPv6 OSPF Routing
    No routes for ospf areas 12, 0, or 34 –> R3: IPv6 GRE Tunnel
    All ospf routes for areas 12, 0, & 34 –> R4: IPv6 RIPng OSPFv3 redistribution

    New Breakdown after the additional removals:
    2 ASW1 0
    2 DSW1 0
    3 R1 0
    0 R2 1
    0 R3 1
    2 R4 1

  6. I
    June 9th, 2017

    @Hopeful,

    Hi friend, one question, what do you mean with below statements, whats mean the column left and colum right?

    New Breakdown after the additional removals:
    2 ASW1 0
    2 DSW1 0
    3 R1 0
    0 R2 1
    0 R3 1
    2 R4 1

  7. I
    June 9th, 2017

    Hi @Hopeful,

    Please ignore previous comment. I undertad now what it is now.

  8. jane woken
    June 30th, 2017

    @Hopeful,

    “I” got understand but not Me. Could you please tell me, that what do you mean with below statements, whats mean the column left and colum right?

    New Breakdown after the additional removals:
    2 ASW1 0
    2 DSW1 0
    3 R1 0
    0 R2 1
    0 R3 1
    2 R4 1

    Thanks in advance

  9. Nappy
    July 3rd, 2017

    @Jjane – left is ipv4 ticket count per device, right is ipv6 ticket count per device. Hope that helps

  10. Anonymous
    July 3rd, 2017

    Nappy – These dumps are still valid right ?

  11. Nick
    July 15th, 2017

    How many M/C questions on the exam?

  12. PASSEIOS A NOITE NO RIO DE JANEIRO
    July 21st, 2017

    Pode até mesmo parecer cliché, porém nenhuma barato
    à capital carioca acontecerá completa nem um tour a fim de convicção Deus
    Deus com próximo e também aproveitar de qualquer das melhores olhos da
    área. As excursões que incluem a atração são muitas e também aproximadamente algum city tour arrebatamento carregar você a qualquer catamênio ao local, embora valor e as
    outras paradas do tour possam diferir bem. Geralmente, uma acontecido através de Alimentação com Doçura similarmente fará assunto desse argumento,
    permitindo que os visitantes conheçam os principais
    pontos do Rio com Janeiro no apenas certo dia. http://www.missquesnel.com/why-locating-cheap-resort-offers-online-is-more-convenient/

  13. General
    July 25th, 2017

    Anyone with the latest dumps please?? Im writing on the 28th of July

  14. mkzozo
    August 2nd, 2017

    i have cleared tshoot exam today with 925 everything is from this site. thanks 9TUT. no need to buy some funny dumps

  15. Peter
    August 2nd, 2017

    Passed today with 1000. Ticket valid. Thanks Networktut.

  16. Suzu
    August 6th, 2017

    Taking a test tomorrow.

    Ticket 16 IPv6 RIPng OSPFv3 Redistribution:
    Problem: Loopback address on R1 (2026::111:1) is not able to ping the loopback address on DSW2 (2026::102:1).

    For this ticket, once I use the command “redistribute rip RIP_ZONE include-connected” on R4, I can also see the routing table update on R1 that 2026::102:0@DSW2 start showing as below.

    OE2 2026::102:0/122 [110/20]
    via FE80::2D0:97FF:FE34:4E28, Serial0/0/0.12

    But, on R1, I can still not ping 2026::102:1. Could someone explain why?

    R1#ping 2026::102:1

    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2026::102:1, timeout is 2 seconds:
    …..
    Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)

    R1#ping ipv6 2026::102:1

    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2026::102:1, timeout is 2 seconds:
    …..
    Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)

    R1#

  17. Vender
    August 7th, 2017

    100% Guaranteed VALID passing Material
    CCNA 200-125 LAtest Dumps
    CCNP ROUTE 300-101 Latest Dumps
    CCNP SWITCH 300-115 LAtest Dumps
    CCNP TSHOOT 300-135 LAtest Dumps
    CCIE R&S 400-101 LAtest Dumps

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cp2vtCYSV_21JTZF9D14Ua2gHdijtZjfIDuyVT1NyJg/edit?usp=sharing

  18. RR
    August 16th, 2017

    @ Dave
    Yes, as shown on the answer option. Other one correction on wrong trunk without correcting on Fa01 down port. 2 others having wrong Po.
    @Ping
    İPV6 ping test 2026::1:2 and 2026::34:2
    does it work? Did not work for me I have relied reading the question with IPV6 details instead.

  19. Reseto
    August 21st, 2017

    In this ticket, it should be IPV6 route redistribution as the answer 2. What do you think?

  20. tshoothelp
    August 27th, 2017

    @Networktut

    Another mistake is on Ticket 16 , from R3 it should be possbile ping the R1 loopback address 2026::111:1 , you can fix it ?

  21. networktut
    August 27th, 2017

    @tshoothelp: Yes, thanks for your detection. We have just fixed it.

  22. jim
    August 28th, 2017

    passwd today with 951, not sure what I missed (layer 3 tech 83%).
    All ticket are the same here.
    It’s my 3rd attemp, so, trust me, get premier member is all u need. Dumps are useful, but I failed twice one or 2 days after they change the questions…
    If u get premier member u can improve and exercise with exam question and u become familiar with the stupid treack cisco put in exam, like more than one bugs (p.e. portchnnel).
    I can assure u all that the money for premier is a good choise. With dump u only copy answers, without understand.
    multich. question: see 221, it is.
    I was sure to pass with 1000, not sure what I fail. Just one strange thing, in OSPF to EIGRP ticket, i see both R3 and R4 with passive interface and route map with wrong name too. I was in doubt about the answer.
    This time I get clue in ticket (ipv4 or IPv6), and now I’m sure in precedent attemp there wasent any clue. So, if u have no clue, I can assure that in all ipv6 ticket client1 can ping 209.65.200.241 web server, in ipv4 ticket client 1 never ping web server.
    Hope to be usefull for all.
    Thank you very much to networkut.

  23. John
    September 7th, 2017

    dear Go-Tshoot! can you please share the lab side so i can practice and if someone having latest dumps please fwd itmann at outlook dot com

  24. Mrs Problem
    September 28th, 2017

    I make configuration on r4 “redistribute rip” but dind`t work
    r1 dont ping asw2 2026:102:1

    I need help to solution

    I used packet tracert 7.0

    R4 #
    ipv6 router ospf 6
    router-id 4.4.4.4
    log-adjacency-changes
    redistribute rip RIP_ZONE
    redistribute connected

    R1#ping
    Protocol [ip]: ipv6
    Target IPv6 address: 2026::102:1
    Repeat count [5]:
    Datagram size [100]:
    Timeout in seconds [2]:
    Extended commands [n]: y
    Source address or interface: 2026::111:1
    Type of service [0]:
    Set DF bit in IP header? [no]:
    Validate reply data? [no]:
    Data pattern [0xABCD]:
    Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]:
    Sweep range of sizes [n]:
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2026::102:1, timeout is 2 seconds:
    Packet sent with a source address of 2026::111:1
    …..
    Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)

  25. Ashok
    September 30th, 2017

    hi Networktut

    Hows that possible that the problem scenario for Ticket 15 & ticket 16 is same?.
    Wont it be a confusion in exam as both scenarios are same ?

  26. Anonymous
    September 30th, 2017

    are these tickets still up to date? Anything new inserted?
    please advise…my email is wufpakbball @ yahoo

  27. Brozzo
    October 4th, 2017

    @Ashok September 30th, 2017

    Please note tat scenarios are very similar but the config problem different… therefore answers are different. Refer to the “Exam ping approaches” suggested elsewhere in this site.

  28. Anonymous
    October 12th, 2017

    Had an IPv6 question. DSW1 could ping R4 IPv6 tunnel dot2 address but not far end dot3. Tunnel configs matched (correct ip’s and configs), so tunnel mode issue. I suspected routing but I think I got it wrong. Is this a new Ticket??

  29. Anonymous
    October 12th, 2017

    Correction to last post …. so no tunnel mode issue .

  30. Prad
    October 18th, 2017

    Finished the exam today with 855 score!
    All tickets, MCQ, Simlets are 100% valid.
    In this ticket IPv6 RIPng OSPFv3 Redistribution, in exam I am unable to ping 2026::1:2 from R1 but in this simulation the ping works. That is the reason I am unable to predict this problem and lost 145 marks.

    My advice is that, even if the pings are not as expected stop wasting time in beating the bush. Try different scenarios.

Comment pages
1 2 3 4 698