Home > Ticket 11 – Redistribution Route-map

Ticket 11 – Redistribution Route-map

April 26th, 2018 in TSHOOT v2 Go to comments

On R4:
router eigrp 10
  redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF->EIGRP
  network 10.1.4.0 0.0.0.255
  network 10.1.10.0 0.0.0.255
  network 10.1.21.128 0.0.0.3
 default-metric 100000 100 100 1 1500
  no auto-summary
!

route-map OSPF_to_EIGRP deny 10
 match tag 90
route-map OSPF_to_EIGRP permit 20
  set tag 110

Ans1) R4
Ans2) IPv4 Route Redistribution
Ans3) Under the EIGRP process, delete the ‘redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF->EIGRP’ command and enter ‘redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF_to_EIGRP’ command.

Explanation for this ticket:

In this topology, we are doing mutual redistribution at multiple points (between OSPF and EIGRP on R4, DSW1 & DSW2), which is a very common cause of network problems, especially routing loops so you should use route-map to prevent redistributed routes from redistributing again into the original domain.

In this ticket, route-map is also used for this purpose. For example, the route-map “EIGRP->OSPF” is used to prevent any routes that have been redistributed into OSPF from redistributed again into EIGRP domain by tagging these routes with tag 90. These routes are prevented from redistributed again by route-map OSPF->EIGRP by denying any routes with tag 90 set.

Comments (23) Comments
Comment pages
1 5 6 7 12
  1. X
    June 7th, 2018

    It looks like there are like 3 or 4 modifications of this ticket.

    1. Under EIGRP process, the statement should be ‘redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF ->EIGRP’
    2. Under EIGRP process, the statement should be ‘redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF_to_EIGRP’
    3. The ‘R’ and ‘P’ are swapped either in the ‘redistribute ospf 1 …’ command or in the route-map command
    4. Under the EIGRP processs, no metric is included ‘redistribute ospf 1’ as ‘CCNP2k’ mentioned

    On the other hand, I would agree with ‘Grateful’.

    We may identify this ‘redistribution’ issue by verifying ‘EXTERNAL’ routes in DSW1,DSW2 and R3.

    -If R3 has external routes (in the output of ‘show ip route’ we should see “O E2”), this means that redistribution “from EIGRP to OSPF” is working.

    -If in DSW1 or DSW2 there is no external routes (in the output of ‘show ip route’ we should see “D EX)”, this means that redistriburion ‘from OSPF to EIGRP’ is not working. So we need to verify redistribution under the EIGRP process in R4.

    Please correct me if i am wrong.

    Thank you.

  2. X
    June 7th, 2018

    On other modification would the be:

    route-map OSFP ->EIGRP permit 20
    set tag 110

    This was mentioned by passpasspass in Jan 19, 2018

  3. X
    June 7th, 2018

    “4. Under the EIGRP processs, no metric is included ‘redistribute ospf 1’ as ‘CCNP2k’ mentioned”

    This would be true if under the EIGRP process the following command is missing “default-metric 100000 100 100 1 1500” * The values might changed.

  4. tommy
    June 15th, 2018

    Hola chicos, como estan?, muchos me preguntan que estrategia utilice para hacer el examen? Mi estrategia es simple e creo que cada uno debe encontrar a propia. La falla es bien especifica en TT el ping al servidor web 209.65.220.241 no responde. Yo realicei ping desde el cliente 1 y donde no responda el ping ejemplo (10.2.1.1 ), alli comienzo a analizar la misma. Utilice solo los siguientes comando, asi como escuchan solo esas, recuerden que tiene que encontrar la falla y vosotros no corrigen nada.

    show ip inter brief ——- capa fisica
    show ip vlan ————– capa enlace
    show ip ospf neighbor — capa de red
    show ipv6 ospf neighbor
    show ip eigrp neighbor — capa de red
    Show ip bgp — capa 2,5 hehe
    Y por ultimo show run

    Lo mas importante es entender la falla no aprender las respuesta, he leido que muchos no identifican las fallas o que piensan que son las mismas preguntas esto se debe que solo aprendio las respuesta y realmente no estas haciendo un tshoot.

    Otra cosa que observe que cuando haces “show run”, no esperes que ella sea igual al simulador de networktut, tomate tu tiempo y analiza.

    Esto todo lo que puede ayudar mucha suerto para los que van a tomar la prueba. Como decimos en mi pais “SI SE PUEDE”.

    Me olvida en mi examen estos fueron TT 1,3,5,6,8,9,11,13,14,16
    HSRP y BGP SIM. Everything is here

  5. Old man
    June 21st, 2018

    @Networktut

    I am wondering why we have this command in all other 15 tickets (redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF->EIGRP’ command) but, we are saying it is wrong in ticket #11?

    It should be like ‘redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF_to_EIGRP’ in all other tickets so we can recognize and correct it in TT#11.

    I do not see anything wrong with ticket #11 when it matches with other working tickets in regard of mutual redistribution of the two routing protocols (EIGRP & OSPF).

    Please help me here!

    Thanks
    -Old man

  6. Pawperso
    July 3rd, 2018

    ‘Old Man’ the redistribution statements are fine but the route map match filters are not

    route-map OSPF->EIGRP deny 10
    match tag 90
    route-map OSPF->EIGRP deny 20
    set tag 110

    +++++

    ‘EIGRP deny 20’ should be a ‘permit’ statement.

  7. Timber
    July 3rd, 2018

    A variation of this ticket is what tripped me up and caused me to fail. I got too nervous and over looked the simple mistakes. I knew it was a redistribution issue and I should have found the issue but I didnt expect it to be something like a miss spelling of OSPF. Really tricky by Cisco.

  8. gtg
    July 3rd, 2018

    @Timber,

    what do you mean miss spelling of OSPF? could you please explain?
    thank you.

  9. Timber
    July 3rd, 2018

    I know it was a redistribution issue but I was having trouble finding the issue and moved on. I am sure it was one of the issues listed though. Most likely a simple miss spelling or else I would have found it. The rest of the tickets I flew through as the issues were obvious.

  10. AK
    July 4th, 2018

    Hi Timber,
    Was there a way to differentiate between IPv4 and IPv6 ticket in the exam?

  11. Timber
    July 5th, 2018

    Most are known to be ipv6 when they use the ipv6 addresses to describe the issue. If you can ping all the way to the webserver though with an ipv4 ping that should be an ipv6 issue as well.

  12. Texas
    July 7th, 2018

    If I am in ticket #1 and it is OSPF, how do I know issue is related to OSPF before starting to troubleshoot?

  13. Nus
    July 9th, 2018

    Failed exam terribly yesterday. Really got confused when attempting this ticket. They come like in the exam as follows and got confused by seeing below statement. I guess immediately second ticket was kind of same and messed it up again. If possible NetworkTUT admin should re write the code for this particular ticket. Also 8 MCQ !!!! never seen before. Watch out guys!!!

    route-map OSPF->EIGRP deny 10
    match tag 90
    route-map OSPF->EIGRP deny 20
    set tag 110

  14. Ag
    July 12th, 2018

    @Nus
    Im confused, what is wrong with the code. Where you saw a problem.

  15. RF
    July 15th, 2018

    Nus, do remember any of the MCQ questions that you had not seen before?

  16. CONFUSED
    July 21st, 2018

    This is a tricky one because if you are denying on the route map without matching any routes you are denying all routes.

  17. mm18
    July 24th, 2018

    to add on in case the qstn turns out to come up differently take note below:

    On R4:
    router eigrp 10
    redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF->EIGRP
    network 10.1.4.0 0.0.0.255
    network 10.1.10.0 0.0.0.255
    network 10.1.21.128 0.0.0.3
    default-metric 100000 100 100 1 1500
    no auto-summary
    !
    route-map OSPF->EIGRP deny 10
    match tag 90
    route-map OSPF->EIGRP deny 20
    set tag 110
    Ans1) R4
    Ans2) IPv4 Route Redistribution
    Ans3) Change the ‗route-map OSPF->EIGRP deny 20‘ to ‗route-map OSPF->EIGRP permit

  18. Ray
    July 28th, 2018

    I failed my Tshoot, new questions and drop and drag was in the exam,
    In 3 of the tickets I could ping the webserver 209.65.200.241 from both client1 and client2
    Can anyone tell me why I could ping the webserver from both client pc’s

  19. ting
    August 3rd, 2018

    @networktut,

    I am the premium member. could you help to explain what had just comment:

    R4 – Problem is with auto-summary (on EIGRP) or with (OSPF) summary-address 10.2.0.0 255.255.0.0.
    In the end when you were examining show ip route you could only see default-route learned in EIGRP (DSW1 or DSW2) and vice-versa in OSPF router R3 you didn’t have any routes concerning 10.1.[1-2].x

    Is this another question? in this ticket I can see we have auto summary as well.
    is auto summary have problem?
    thank you.

  20. Anonymous
    August 5th, 2018

    @networktut / all,

    inside the configuration practice for premium member, I could see the auto summary, but not as this page ‘no auto summary’.. some people say the mistakes is at auto summary.
    anyone could explain, if these both scenario appear, what should we chose?

    router eigrp 10
    redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF->EIGRP
    network 10.1.4.0 0.0.0.255
    network 10.1.10.0 0.0.0.255
    network 10.1.21.128 0.0.0.3
    default-metric 100000 100 100 1 1500
    auto-summary

    thank you!!

  21. CCNP Boy
    August 5th, 2018

    Can someone who has take the exam recently ( today or yesterday ) if the issue with this ticket is the route-map ( EIGRP deny 20 ) or the no auto-summary in router eigrp 10 …. Thanks

    Regards,

  22. help
    August 25th, 2018

    can anyone please explain this ticket .. i am a premium member please

  23. Anonymous
    August 29th, 2018

    Can someone tell me if there are only options Ans1), Ans2) and Ans3) or you have to do configure /correct things buy entering into global configuration mode ?

Comment pages
1 5 6 7 12